The Myth of AIDS (trendsupdates.com)
Witness the report published in mid-1993 by a group of Australian researchers led by Dr. Eleni Papadopoulos-Eleopulos. In this breakthrough report, the scientists raise serious questions about the accuracy of HIV antibody tests and, more important, the very relationship between HIV and AIDS.
Eleven years ago Dr. Peter Duesberg was a lone voice in the world of AIDS research. At that time, the molecular biologist, world-renowned virologist, and UCLA professor began asking a question that seems like heresy to this day: Is it possible that we were wrong when we equated HIV with AIDS?
While any scientific discussion should allow such a challenge, others tried to silence Dr. Duesberg. AIDS research [the highly profitable industry] continues to be driven by the hypothesis that HIV is the cause, with virtually all our medical and scientific resources invested in this hypothesis.
But several outstanding scientific voices are joining Dr. Duesberg in denouncing this approach.
Witness the report published in mid-1993 by a group of Australian researchers led by Dr. Eleni Papadopoulos-Eleopulos. In this breakthrough report, the scientists raise serious questions about the accuracy of HIV antibody tests and, more important, the very relationship between HIV and AIDS. They show that the HIV tests produce inconsistent results, both within one laboratory that tested a sample twice and between two labs that tested the same sample. What's more, it's nearly impossible to determine the rate of "false positives" [who are put on profitable drugs that then lead to many of the symptoms of AIDS by knocking out the immune system] because there is no "gold standard" to independently verify test results, as reported in the New York Native.
And that's not all. Among other things, the researchers also found that HIV cannot be isolated in all AIDS patients. Yet, HIV can be found in people who are HIV-antibody negative.
They found that people with non-AIDS diseases have antibodies that can register a positive result on the HIV-antibody test. [If one tests positive, particularly on the many free tests available to the elation and likely lobbying of pharmaceutical interests, it is likely a false positive; test again when health improves and find that suddenly there's no HIV/AIDS since most tests shockingly test for correlated symptoms not actual disease.]
They found that the p24 antigen is not, as is widely believed, an indicator of HIV infection or AIDS. Indeed, people with multiple sclerosis, T-cell lymphoma, generalized warts, and other diseases have the p24 antigen.
In short, it's time to face the disturbing notion that much of what we've been told about AIDS is incorrect.
Here are some of the factors that have led scientists to challenge the well-entrenched hypothesis that HIV equals AIDS: More
- The Myth of a Heterosexual AIDS Pandemic
- Ending the AIDS Myth: It is not a contagious disease
- Despite common belief, there is no scientific evidence to this day that AIDS is a contagious disease. The current AIDS theory falls short in predicting the kind of AIDS disease an infected person may be manifesting, and there is no accurate system to determine how long it will take for the disease to develop. In addition, the current HIV/AIDS theory contains no reliable information that can help identify those who are at risk of developing AIDS.
- Myths About HIV-AIDS
- AIDS: The HIV myth
